Compare RTK and GPS spraying drone: Pros and cons

The advancement of RTK and GPS spraying drone is transforming how farmers manage their crops. While RTK stands out for its high precision and even spraying across varied terrains, GPS earns points for its flexibility, affordable price, and ease of operation. Understanding each system’s strengths and weaknesses allows farmers to optimize costs and long-term returns.

So sánh drone phun thuốc RTK và GPS về ưu nhược điểm

Overview of RTK and GPS spraying drone

Concept and working principle of RTK spraying drone

An RTK spraying drone is an unmanned aerial vehicle equipped with a Real-Time Kinematic (RTK) positioning system that determines location with centimeter-level accuracy. The technology uses real-time correction data exchanged between the drone and an RTK base station to ensure precise flight paths and spraying zones, minimizing coordinate deviation during operation.

Compared with conventional spraying drone, an RTK spraying drone works by combining GNSS signal transmission with differential correction, maintaining stability throughout spraying-especially on uneven fields or in areas with weak signal coverage.

How GPS spraying drone position and transmit signals

A GPS spraying drone relies on the Global Positioning System to determine its position and navigate. It receives signals from multiple satellites simultaneously and calculates its current coordinates to maintain its route. However, a GPS drone usually achieves an accuracy of ±50–100 cm, depending on weather, obstacles, and signal strength.

In practice, GPS performs well for small farms where pinpoint accuracy is not critical. Yet when synchronized mapping or complex topographic spraying is required, the RTK spraying drone clearly shows superior performance.

The role of precise positioning in modern agricultural spraying

In smart farming, precise positioning directly affects spraying efficiency. Even a few centimeters of deviation can cause uneven pesticide distribution, leading to waste and reduced yields.

Thanks to real-time correction, RTK spraying drone ensure each crop row receives the exact dosage required, reducing 20–30% of pesticide use compared to traditional methods. This technology helps farmers save costs while protecting the environment and operator health.

Differences between RTK and GPS spraying drone

Accuracy and flight stability of RTK and GPS systems

Criteria

RTK Spraying Drone

GPS Spraying Drone

Accuracy

Error < 3 cm

Error 50–100 cm

Flight stability

High, precise coordinate tracking

Affected by wind or signal interference

Autonomous flight path

Fully accurate per RTK map

May deviate 1–2 m in field

Best use case

Large fields, complex terrain

Small farms, flat areas

This performance gap makes the RTK spraying drone the preferred option for precision farms or high-tech cooperatives.

Operation in complex environmental conditions

When flying in areas with dense canopy, hilly terrain, or weak satellite signals, a GPS spraying drone can lose positioning or drift off course. In contrast, an RTK drone maintains precise coordinates through the data link between its RTK base station and rover unit.

This advantage is crucial during rainy seasons or nighttime spraying, where visibility is limited. In fact, models like DJI T40 RTK or T50 RTK perform stably in signal-interference environments, minimizing collision and flight-path errors.

Signal correction and response speed of each technology

RTK systems provide correction within less than one second, allowing the drone to instantly adjust altitude or direction when deviation occurs. GPS, on the other hand, takes 3–5 seconds to update coordinates, making flight adjustments less precise.

Thanks to this fast correction, RTK spraying drone deliver smoother and more stable flight paths, optimizing pesticide coverage and reducing operation time by 10–15% per hectare compared with GPS.

Advantages of RTK spraying drone in agriculture

Centimeter-level precision ensures uniform spraying

An RTK spraying drone offers centimeter-level positioning accuracy, enabling even spraying across the entire field. This feature is particularly valuable on sloped terrain, terraces, or mixed crops.

By controlling the spray zone precisely, RTK prevents flight path overlap, a common issue with GPS drones that can cause over-application at boundary points.

Automatically adjusts flight path to terrain

By integrating 3D terrain maps and RTK base data, an RTK spraying drone can automatically adjust altitude, speed, and spray angle based on ground slope.

This capability is especially beneficial for paddy fields, industrial crops, and low-lying lands where terrain varies. As a result, coverage remains consistent without missed or duplicated zones.

Reduces pesticide loss and labor costs

Field tests show farms using RTK drones reduce pesticide consumption by 20–30% and labor costs by over 40% compared to manual spraying.

An RTK spraying drone can treat one hectare in just a few minutes, minimizing chemical drift outside target zones. This long-term investment is highly effective for operations covering over 10 hectares per day.

Limitations of RTK spraying drone compared to GPS

High initial cost and technical operation requirements

An RTK spraying drone such as the DJI T40 or T50 costs around USD 8,000–12,000, significantly higher than standard GPS drones. In addition, operators must be trained to handle base calibration, mapping, and signal correction.

This can be a barrier for smallholders with limited capital or little experience using advanced agricultural equipment.

Dependence on RTK base station and signal stability

RTK systems only perform optimally when the connection between the base station and drone remains uninterrupted. In mountainous regions or areas with weak networks, RTK drones may experience temporary signal loss or coordinate drift.

Using a mobile RTK or Virtual Reference Station (VRS) can mitigate this issue, but it raises initial setup costs.

Complex maintenance and skilled operation needed

Due to multiple sensors and high-end modules, maintaining an RTK spraying drone is more complex than a GPS model. Operators must know how to update firmware, calibrate RTK modules, and inspect systems regularly.

Improper maintenance can cause synchronization loss, affecting accuracy. Thus, partnering with authorized DJI service centers ensures performance longevity and precise operation.

Advantages of GPS spraying drone in practice

Affordable and accessible for small farms

Why do many small farms choose GPS spraying drone? → Because they are more budget-friendly and require far lower upfront investment than RTK spraying drone. Popular models like DJI T20P or T25P cost about USD 5,000–7,000-ideal for family farms or cooperatives.

Additionally, maintenance costs are low and no RTK base station or stable network is needed, allowing easy operation.

Simple operation suited for basic infrastructure

A major advantage of GPS spraying drone is ease of use. Farmers can set boundaries and spray routes via mobile apps without RTK calibration or complex positioning setup.

This makes GPS drones perfect for rural areas lacking stable internet, where deploying RTK spraying drone can be challenging.

Flexible application for various crops and terrains

GPS spraying drone perform well on rice, corn, sugarcane, coffee, rubber, and fruit trees, handling both flat and gently sloped fields.

When paired with auto-mapping, GPS drones still ensure efficient spraying for farms under 10 hectares, making them a practical and popular choice for smallholders.

Comparison of spraying efficiency between RTK and GPS

Coverage accuracy and spray uniformity

Criteria

RTK Spraying Drone

GPS Spraying Drone

Spray zone accuracy

±3 cm

±50–100 cm

Path overlap rate

<3%

8–12%

Spray uniformity

High and stable

Inconsistent near field edges

Performance on large fields

Even coverage

Minor deviations at boundaries

With its superior precision, the RTK spraying drone is ideal for high-tech farms demanding exact pesticide distribution.

Real-world pesticide savings

Field trials in Đồng Tháp and Lâm Đồng show RTK spraying drone save 25–30% pesticide compared to GPS. The key advantage lies in its precise path control and reduced overlap-essential for farms larger than 20 hectares.

Meanwhile, GPS drones still achieve 10–15% savings versus manual spraying, making them efficient for smaller operations.

Productivity and spraying time per area

A DJI T50 RTK drone can spray 15–20 hectares/day, while GPS drones typically manage 10–12 hectares/day depending on conditions. RTK’s accurate navigation minimizes manual adjustments, shortening task duration.

For small farms, however, GPS remains efficient and cost-effective for limited-scale spraying.

So sánh drone phun thuốc RTK và GPS về ưu nhược điểm

Investment efficiency and operational costs

Ownership and maintenance cost comparison

Category

RTK Spraying Drone

GPS Spraying Drone

Purchase cost

200–300 million VND

120–180 million VND

Annual maintenance

10–15 million VND

5–8 million VND

Average lifespan

4–5 years

3–4 years

Replacement parts

20–30% higher cost

Cheaper, widely available

Though more expensive upfront, RTK spraying drone deliver faster ROI when operated at scale due to superior efficiency and chemical savings.

Economic effectiveness for small and large farms

For farms under 10 hectares, GPS is more economical-easy to maintain and operate. However, for farms over 20 hectares, RTK spraying drone drastically reduce labor and chemical costs, leading to sustainable profitability.

Large cooperatives report ROI within 1.5–2 years after adopting RTK systems.

ROI and payback period for RTK spraying drone

An RTK spraying drone can save 15–20 million VND per hectare per season in chemicals and labor. With 2–3 uses annually, payback time averages 1–2 years, depending on workload.

This explains why modern farms are rapidly transitioning from GPS to RTK for better long-term efficiency.

Choosing the right technology for each farm

When to invest in RTK spraying drone for large farms

Choose an RTK spraying drone when:

  1. The cultivated area exceeds 20 hectares.
  2. High-precision spraying is required.
  3. Trained operators are available.
  4. The area has stable internet or base station access.
  5. The farm aims for smart, automated agriculture.

When GPS spraying drone still perform well

For farms under 10 hectares, GPS spraying drone are ideal. They’re cheaper, easier to maintain, and still cut spraying costs by 30–40% compared to manual methods.

GPS also performs reliably in areas lacking RTK or network signals, maintaining stable flight without a base station.

Tips for choosing the right DJI model

When purchasing, farmers should:

  • Prioritize official RTK-certified models like DJI T40 RTK, T50 RTK, or T70P RTK.
  • Check terrain sensors, dual-spray systems, and tank capacity.
  • Review warranty and service options from authorized dealers.
  • Evaluate ROI based on spraying volume per season.

With the right choice, both RTK and GPS spraying drone help farmers boost productivity, save costs, and advance toward sustainable smart farming.

FAQs about RTK and GPS spraying drone

Do RTK spraying drone require internet connectivity?

Not always. RTK spraying drone can operate with local base stations for correction, needing internet only for map updates and data synchronization.

Can RTK drones operate without satellite signals?

Yes, temporarily. They use backup data for navigation, though accuracy drops. Once signals stabilize, the RTK system automatically re-calibrates.

Can a GPS drone be upgraded to RTK?

Some high-end models support external RTK modules, but upgrades are costly. Buying a fully integrated RTK version ensures better compatibility and performance.

Are RTK spraying drone suitable for small fields?

Not necessary. For areas under 10 hectares, GPS spraying drone work efficiently, saving costs and simplifying operation.

What is the average lifespan of an RTK spraying drone?

Typically 4–5 years, depending on use and maintenance. Proper care extends lifespan and maintains high-precision positioning.