Evaluating the performance of crop-spraying drones on large-scale fields

In modern agriculture, drones have replaced manual labor in pesticide spraying, providing fast, even, and precise coverage across dozens of hectares. Equipped with radar, GPS, and high-pressure spraying systems, these drones achieve up to 10 times higher efficiency than traditional methods.

Đánh giá máy bay xịt thuốc sâu trên cánh đồng lớn về hiệu suất


Overview of crop-spraying drones in modern agriculture

Mechanization trend in pesticide application

The rise of crop-spraying drones marks a new era in Vietnamese agriculture. Instead of low-efficiency manual spraying, farmers now embrace automation to save costs and ensure safety. Using drones boosts spraying efficiency by 5–10 times while reducing chemical exposure risks by up to 90%.

Advantages of drones over manual spraying

Field surveys show drones can spray 20–30 hectares per day, depending on terrain, whereas manual labor covers only 2–3 hectares. Fine mist systems ensure uniform coverage and reduce chemical use by 20–25% compared to traditional methods. Remote operation and GPS automation also lower labor costs significantly.

Popular drone brands in Vietnam

  • DJI Agras: Models T30, T40, T50 - known for durability and high spraying efficiency.
  • XAG P100/P200: Equipped with dual radar systems for precise spraying on complex terrain.
  • Vietnamese-made drones: Affordable, easy to maintain, suitable for smallholder farms.

Performance analysis of drone spraying on large fields

Key metrics for evaluating spraying efficiency

Drone spraying performance is generally measured by:

  1. Average spray area per hour: typically 5–7 hectares, depending on configuration.
  2. Droplet density: 40–60 droplets/cm² minimum for effective pest control.
  3. Chemical loss rate: under 10% due to precise pressure sensors and altitude radar.

Impact of terrain and field size

Flat terrains allow stable drone flight and uniform coverage. However, efficiency can drop 10–15% on sloped or windy fields. Adjusting flight altitude, speed, and spray volume according to manufacturer recommendations helps maintain consistent results.

Drone vs. manual labor efficiency comparison

Criteria

Crop-spraying drone

Manual labor

Productivity

20–30 ha/day

2–3 ha/day

Chemical consumption

20–25% lower

Normal

Coverage accuracy

High (GPS-guided)

Low, manual variation

Worker safety

No chemical exposure

High risk of poisoning

→ Overall, drones are 10 times more efficient than manual spraying, saving time, cost, and reducing health risks for farmers.


Evaluation of drone technology and operating capacity

Dual radar and obstacle avoidance systems

Advanced models like DJI T40 use dual radar to detect obstacles in real time, preventing collisions around tall crops or power lines. Ultrasonic sensors measure altitude precisely, ensuring stable spraying height and minimizing chemical waste.

GPS accuracy and autonomous flight control

Most crop-spraying drones feature RTK GPS positioning, allowing precise mapping down to each square meter. Operators can program autonomous routes - the drone takes off, sprays, and lands automatically. This increases operational efficiency by 25–30% while reducing human error.

Tank capacity and flight speed impact

Drones typically carry 15–40 liters of liquid. Each 10–15 minute flight can cover 1–2 hectares. The optimal speed range of 5–7 m/s ensures even droplet distribution without wind drift. Farmers should balance tank size, battery weight, and field area when selecting models.


Operating costs and economic benefits

Cost comparison: drone vs manual spraying

Hiring drone spraying services costs about 150,000–180,000 VND per hectare, roughly 30% cheaper than manual spraying (220,000–250,000 VND/ha). Drones can also work 8–10 hours daily without fatigue or weather limitations.

Payback period for drone investment

A DJI Agras T40 costs around 250–300 million VND. When spraying 500 hectares annually, after deducting battery and maintenance costs, profits can reach 150–200 million VND/year - meaning ROI within 1.5–2 years, especially when offering spraying services to multiple farms.

Main operational and maintenance cost factors

  • Batteries & chargers: replace after 500–800 charge cycles.
  • Nozzles & spray heads: clean every 10 operating hours.
  • Spare parts: about 5–10% of drone value per year.

→ Regular maintenance extends drone lifespan and reduces mid-season breakdown risks.


Real-world field trials and outcomes

Performance and coverage on fields over 10 hectares

In Đồng Tháp, trials with the DJI T40 achieved 12 hectares/hour at 95% coverage efficiency. Spraying uniformity improved significantly, cutting pesticide use by 20% compared to traditional sprayers.

Farmer feedback on productivity and cost savings

Farmers reported 25–30% cost reduction and 10x faster spraying speed. They also emphasized the improved safety and convenience of drone spraying versus manual labor.

Current challenges for large-scale drone spraying

  • High initial investment cost.
  • Need for trained operators and maintenance knowledge.
  • Dependence on battery management and charging logistics.

→ Manufacturers are addressing these challenges with fast-charging batteries and AI-assisted flight systems for greater reliability.


Comparison among popular crop-spraying drone brands

DJI Agras series (T30, T40, T50)

Known for strong performance, durability, and precision. The T50, with a 40L tank and 4D radar, achieves up to 20 hectares/hour under ideal conditions.

DJI vs XAG comparison

Criteria

DJI Agras T40

XAG P200

Tank capacity

40 L

50 L

Radar system

4D obstacle avoidance

Dual radar + LiDAR

Flight stability

High, effective wind compensation

Very high, auto-balancing

Average price

~300 million VND

~350 million VND

→ Both deliver exceptional performance, but DJI holds an advantage in availability and maintenance support within Vietnam.

Advantages of locally manufactured drones

While less powerful (15–20L tanks), Vietnamese-made drones are cheaper, easier to repair, and well-suited for smaller farms with complex terrains - making them a practical choice for cooperatives and smallholders exploring drone technology.


Conclusion and selection recommendations

Summary of performance results

Crop-spraying drones demonstrate superior efficiency, precision, and cost savings. Their widespread adoption marks a major step toward agricultural modernization in Vietnam.

Suggested models by production scale

  • Small farms: 15–20L drones such as DJI T20P.
  • Large farms: 30–50L models like DJI T50 or XAG P200.
  • Service providers: drones with fast-charging batteries and 4D radar systems.

→ Choosing the right crop-spraying drone model ensures maximum efficiency and cost-effectiveness.

The combination of smart sensors, radar technology, and automated control proves that crop-spraying drones are a strategic, high-return solution for large-scale farming in the near future.


FAQs about crop-spraying drones

Do I need a pilot license to operate a spraying drone?

Yes. Operators must complete training and obtain certification for agricultural drone control in compliance with civil aviation safety regulations.

Can drones spray during the rainy season?

Yes, but operators should adjust flight speed and spray volume. Some models are equipped with wind sensors and waterproof radar, but avoid heavy rain to maintain coverage accuracy.

How long do drone batteries last?

Typically 500–800 charge cycles, depending on quality and usage. Proper storage, avoiding overheating, and balanced charging cycles extend battery lifespan and flight stability.

What types of pesticides can drones spray?

They’re compatible with most liquid pesticides, including biological solutions. Avoid thick or particle-heavy mixtures that could clog nozzles.

What capacity drone suits small farms?

For farms under 10 hectares, choose 15–20L models like the DJI T20P or local 18L drones - affordable, easy to maintain, and efficient for small-scale spraying.